Obama or McCain? You Decide.



Barack Obama is the only candidate that has been successful at reaching across party lines in the presidential election.

I as well have not had much to say on The Dirt. It is unfortunate that I no longer consider myself in tune with life in the Delta and can no longer comment as such. My free time (what little of it I have) has also been dedicated to following both the presidential election and American Idol like a hawk. That having been said, I am not afraid to admit that my name is on Amy's list of previously sane people who are seriously considering Obama in November.

Now, my consideration depends on a lot of future events to fall into place. First and foremost, Obama will have to beat Hillary for the Democratic nomination. If that were to happen, my pick between Obama and McCain would also depend on who each picks for their veep candidate. As a self-proclaimed independent, I find myself torn between these two candidates and refuse to make a blind decision based on what certain political parties or ideologies tell me I should do. I think Americans as a whole have reached a point at which we are educated enough to vote on issues, rather than a person's political affiliation.

The main issue that will eventually affect my decision is the War in Iraq. And based on polls I have seen, I am not the only one who feels that way. John McCain has been quoted as saying that he would not be against spending the next 100 years occupying Iraq, if that's what it takes to "win". I respectfully disagree. I am of the belief that the war has gotten out of hand under the (lack of) leadership of President Bush. I see this war as our generation's Vietnam. There is no end in sight, no winning strategy as of yet, and it is being fought over oil.

I don't think that we need to pull out all of our troops immediately, as that would cause even more trouble in Iraq. I do, however, think that we should have a firm timeline to turn control back over the the Iraqis, and to get our troops home. You don't hear of any major successes in Iraq any more. All you hear about are the bodies that are coming home to meet grieving parents, spouses, and children. The fact is that the Middle East region has been fighting over oil since oil became a major source of fuel. We jumped in the middle of their war, with no real support from other nations, because for some reason America feels that we need to be the World Police.

In my humble opinion, we should be spending our nation's resources devising ways to lessen our dependence on foreign oil, rather than fighting to maintain control over a fuel that has been steadily increasing in price and continues to pollute our natural environment. At the risk of sounding like a bonafide tree-hugger, I think it is of paramount importance to start really looking into green energy -- energy that doesn't produce a filthy brown haze in the air above our cities and energy that doesn't get us into wars we can't win. Obama agrees with me.

While I realize that this is just one issue in the grand scheme of things, and I don't agree with every issue that Obama supports, this issue is the most important to me. Everyone has a right to their own opinions; it just seems that as more and more Americans begin to think about who they want to lead this nation over the next four years, they are beginning to see that Obama is not a bad alternative. He is young, inspiring, and is reaching out to both sides of the political spectrum. And that is an accomplishment that neither Hillary or McCain can claim.

I am not completely sold on Obama just yet. And rest assured that if Hillary gets the nomination, I will be voting for John McCain. But that has less to do with my excitement for McCain and more to do with my disgust for Hillary. At this point in the game, Obama seems like a good alternative to the same old song and dance. I will be looking forward to the first presidential debate, to be held in Oxford in September, to further help me decide who will eventually get my vote.

Comments

Amy McCullough said…
Careful there, Thomas. Someone might think you are of the opinion that those who often support one political party over another do so because they neglect to put their thinking caps on -- could be just the opposite.

Unfortunately, one of McCain's biggest plugs for quite some time has been that he does try to reach across party lines. In fact, he has done this so much that he at one point considered leaving the Republican party and running with Kerry.

(And no, for the record, Thomas and I are not being snarky with one other. We just enjoy intelligent discussion.)
Anonymous said…
I hope for all our sakes that Obama is not elected to lead the free world when he has no clue what the job entails.

It is unfortunate but not surprising that a candidate with so little experience and plenty of hype has captured the fancy of our young people. They have been disconnected from reality for so long that music videos and inane slogans have stirred them up in such a frenzy that they refuse to actually consider the politics of a candidate. After all, this is the playstation ipod generation what can we expect? Unfortunately we cannot hit the restart button when things get out of control. God help us if we lose our nerve and roll over in this war on terror.
Anonymous said…
Why don't you consider Ron Paul. That is who I am supporting.
Thomas Gregory said…
I agree with the political party assessment. I was just trying to relate why I don't fit the mold of a particular party. It is because I want to allow myself to be open minded without fear of political outfall.

McCain has tried to reach across party lines, but has alienated his conservative base in the process. Democrats love Obama for reaching out to Republicans, which makes his move much more successful. If McCain's attempts to reach out causes division on the other side, it is counter-productive to bringing the country together. That is all I am saying.

Snarky? Me and Amy? Never. Just a good, open political discussion, which is what this country needs more of. And I think we will see more of this around the country as time moves on.
Anonymous said…
Jimmy Carter
Anonymous said…
Dear anonymous
WOW!
"After all, this is the playstation ipod generation what can we expect?"
I'll tell you what you can expect. That when your OLD wrinkled hands need to call someone for help and reach for your little CELL PHONE(which by the way was brought to you by this "young" generation) you'll be thankful that we didn't press the OFF button on you.
Besides, what credentials do you have or what have you done to make this "BUSH" era a worthy one. THINK of what your impact has been in this country before you go insulting the intelligence of this our generation... that by the way has given you the avenue to even post your IMMATURE comments.
Go have some hot chocolate and play some "bingo"... and while you're at it... press the reset button on your comments.
Anonymous said…
The "child" doth protest too much.I Must have hit the bullseye on that one.

Lighten up or maybe a bit more sugar for your Koolade.
Thomas Gregory said…
Ron Paul is an idiot and has no chance at getting the nomination. It doesn't matter if you do vote for him now, he won't be an option in November.
Anonymous said…
Ron Paul may not have a chance in November, but an idiot he is not. He is the only candidate who is against the war (even from the beginning) and for small govt. Yeah, what an idiot.
Thomas Gregory said…
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are against the war. Barack Obama was against it from the beginning. Paul has no real plans for health care. He wants to abolish the Department of Education. His policies are radical and baseless and have no practicality in the real world. That is why he has no chance in November and that is why he is an idiot.
Anonymous said…
And you don't see the reason he wants to abolish the Dept. of Education? It serves no purpose. The federal govt. has no constitutional authority to fund or control schools. Schools should be funded by local taxes, and the parents and teachers can directly decide what to do with money.
Thomas Gregory said…
The federal government doesn't have the constitutional authority to do a lot of things. Good thing the original constitution and its amendments aren't the only source of the federal government's power. It comes from over 200 years of congressional legislation and court decisions that have evolved over time to make our country the great nation that it is today.

As for education, do you honestly think that if the federal government turned education over to Greenwood and Leflore County's crooked school boards, that it would improve things locally? Hardly. Without at least some sort of governmental oversight, education (and other) funds would be siphoned into the pockets of the corrupt and the youth of America would suffer the consequences.

Just saying "small government" doesn't fix the problem. For Ron Paul to not be an idiot, he would have to explain exactly what he would do if he abolished DOE. He would need a legitimate plan for turning the school system back to the states. He doesn't have one and he doesn't need one, because he too realizes that his chance of earning the nomination are about as good as mine.

Why put forth solid ideas when you can start a movement by preaching hell, fire and brimstone, and by screaming that we need to abolish the federal government?
Anonymous said…
Regardless, I will be voting for Dr. Paul in the MS primary on March 11. I don't care if it is a "wasted vote". I don't care if he gets 5 percent or less of the vote. I am voting for the person who I feel is best qualified for the job, and that man is Ron Paul.
Thomas Gregory said…
And that is exactly what you should do. Just be thinking about who you will vote for in November, if anyone. I look forward to more of this debate in the coming months.

Popular posts from this blog

Official Delta Dirt Merchandise Now Available

Editorial: As Predicted, McCain Falls in the Polls